THMZ vs. FIXT
THMZ (Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. THMZ is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. Over the past year, THMZ returned 12.58% vs 4.69% for FIXT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THMZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.
Performance
THMZ vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THMZ achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.71% return.
THMZ
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 12.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIXT
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THMZ vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF | 0.98% | 11.29% |
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF | 0.71% | 4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between THMZ and FIXT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THMZ vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank
THMZ
FIXT
THMZ vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THMZ | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.22 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 1.56 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 4.33 | -1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THMZ vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THMZ drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMZ and FIXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THMZ | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -3.02% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -3.02% | -12.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -1.42% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -0.75% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 1.08% | +3.39% |
Volatility
THMZ vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 0.91%. This indicates that THMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THMZ | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 0.91% | +5.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 2.48% | +11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 3.77% | +12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 3.74% | +15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 3.74% | +15.42% |
THMZ vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
THMZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
THMZ vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison
THMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than FIXT's 5.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF | 5.52% | 3.24% |
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF | 0.24% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THMZ and FIXT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THMZ has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to FIXT (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THMZ dropped -15.99% vs FIXT's -3.02%.
On 1-year performance, THMZ leads with 12.58% vs 4.69% for FIXT. On fees, THMZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, THMZ has performed better with a 12.58% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
THMZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.
FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 0.24% for THMZ.
They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for THMZ and 0.75% for FIXT.
FIXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THMZ and FIXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer