THIR vs. TDSA
THIR (THOR Index Rotation ETF) and TDSA (Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds - THIR tracks the THOR SDQ Rotation Index while TDSA tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. THIR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TDSA.
Performance
THIR vs. TDSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
THIR
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THIR vs. TDSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF | 4.64% |
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% |
THIR vs. TDSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
THIR
TDSA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
THIR
TDSA
Communication Services
THIR
TDSA
Consumer Cyclical
THIR
TDSA
Healthcare
THIR
TDSA
Consumer Defensive
THIR
TDSA
Financial Services
THIR
TDSA
Industrials
THIR
TDSA
Energy
THIR
TDSA
Utilities
THIR
TDSA
Basic Materials
THIR
TDSA
Real Estate
THIR
TDSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THIR vs. TDSA — Risk / Return Rank
THIR
TDSA
THIR vs. TDSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THIR | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.97 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THIR | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | — | — |
Drawdowns
THIR vs. TDSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THIR drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, which is greater than TDSA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THIR and TDSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THIR | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | 0.00% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | 0.00% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | 0.00% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility
THIR vs. TDSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THIR | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 0.00% | +11.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 0.00% | +12.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 0.00% | +12.64% |
THIR vs. TDSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
THIR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TDSA's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
THIR vs. TDSA - Dividend Comparison
THIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, THIR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THIR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TDSA.
THIR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.
THIR tracks THOR SDQ Rotation Index, while TDSA tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: THOR and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for THIR and 0.83% for TDSA.
Find the right allocation for THIR and TDSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer