PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THIMX vs. TINGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THIMX vs. TINGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Intermediate Municipal Fund (THIMX) and Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THIMX achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than TINGX's 12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, THIMX has underperformed TINGX with an annualized return of 1.96%, while TINGX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.36% annualized return.


THIMX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.45%
YTD
1.84%
6M
2.15%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
1.64%
10Y*
1.96%

TINGX

1D
1.88%
1M
5.33%
YTD
12.73%
6M
13.38%
1Y
16.82%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
7.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THIMX vs. TINGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THIMX
Thornburg Intermediate Municipal Fund
1.84%5.97%2.45%4.88%-6.63%1.00%3.81%5.86%0.70%3.61%
TINGX
Thornburg International Growth Fund
12.73%10.63%2.46%18.41%-26.05%-4.22%34.34%26.27%-16.75%34.94%

Correlation

The correlation between THIMX and TINGX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

-0.06

The correlation between THIMX and TINGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THIMX vs. TINGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THIMX
THIMX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
THIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
THIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
THIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
THIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TINGX
TINGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TINGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TINGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THIMX vs. TINGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Intermediate Municipal Fund (THIMX) and Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THIMXTINGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.20

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.36

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

4.18

+5.35

THIMX vs. TINGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THIMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the TINGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THIMX and TINGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THIMX vs. TINGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THIMX drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, smaller than the maximum TINGX drawdown of -62.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THIMX and TINGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THIMXTINGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-62.73%

+52.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.39%

-11.83%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.32%

-19.94%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

-43.27%

+33.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.22%

-43.27%

+33.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.33%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-13.55%

+12.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

3.84%

-3.17%

Volatility

THIMX vs. TINGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Intermediate Municipal Fund (THIMX) is 0.60%, while Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that THIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THIMXTINGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

6.39%

-5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

12.97%

-11.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

15.47%

-13.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

17.23%

-13.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.28%

17.15%

-13.87%

THIMX vs. TINGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THIMX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than TINGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

THIMX vs. TINGX - Dividend Comparison

THIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than TINGX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THIMX
Thornburg Intermediate Municipal Fund
3.67%4.82%4.03%2.60%2.40%2.25%2.39%2.62%2.48%2.18%2.04%2.08%
TINGX
Thornburg International Growth Fund
0.95%1.08%8.40%0.58%0.72%6.86%1.17%0.72%4.39%3.60%0.36%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


THIMX and TINGX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINGX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to THIMX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THIMX dropped -10.22% vs TINGX's -62.73%.

THIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THIMX and TINGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer