PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THEQ vs. QHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THEQ vs. QHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) and Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THEQ achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than QHDG's 1.05% return.


THEQ

1D
0.29%
1M
3.15%
YTD
7.47%
6M
7.42%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QHDG

1D
0.02%
1M
0.77%
YTD
1.05%
6M
0.36%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THEQ vs. QHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
THEQ
T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF
7.47%12.87%
QHDG
Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF
1.05%17.48%

Correlation

The correlation between THEQ and QHDG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.83

The correlation between THEQ and QHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

THEQ vs. QHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THEQ
QHDG

Financial Services

84.3%
0.2%

Technology

3.5%
53.8%

Healthcare

1.5%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
7.7%

Utilities

0.7%
1.4%

Communication Services

0.7%
15.8%

Industrials

0.6%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.6%
12.3%

Energy

0.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Financial Services

THEQ
84.3%
QHDG
0.2%

Technology

THEQ
3.5%
QHDG
53.8%

Healthcare

THEQ
1.5%
QHDG
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

THEQ
0.9%
QHDG
7.7%

Utilities

THEQ
0.7%
QHDG
1.4%

Communication Services

THEQ
0.7%
QHDG
15.8%

Industrials

THEQ
0.6%
QHDG
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

THEQ
0.6%
QHDG
12.3%

Energy

THEQ
0.4%
QHDG
0.6%

Basic Materials

THEQ
0.1%
QHDG
1.1%

Real Estate

THEQ
0.1%
QHDG
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THEQ vs. QHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THEQ
THEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
THEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
THEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
THEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
THEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QHDG
QHDG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
QHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
QHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THEQ vs. QHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) and Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THEQQHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

1.66

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

5.65

+7.38

THEQ vs. QHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the QHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THEQ and QHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THEQQHDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.32

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

0.89

+0.65

Drawdowns

THEQ vs. QHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.08%, smaller than the maximum QHDG drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THEQ and QHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THEQQHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-15.29%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-7.00%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.99%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-2.15%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.05%

-0.65%

Volatility

THEQ vs. QHDG - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) at 0.24%. This indicates that THEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THEQQHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

0.24%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.47%

6.51%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.65%

8.78%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.54%

12.43%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.54%

12.43%

-0.89%

THEQ vs. QHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

THEQ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than QHDG's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

THEQ vs. QHDG - Dividend Comparison

THEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while QHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
QHDG
Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.02%
THEQ
T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF
0.74%0.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THEQ and QHDG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THEQ has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to QHDG (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THEQ dropped -8.08% vs QHDG's -15.29%.

On 1-year performance, THEQ leads with 18.16% vs 11.54% for QHDG. On fees, THEQ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, QHDG has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, THEQ has performed better with a 18.16% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THEQ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QHDG.

THEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for QHDG.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for THEQ and 0.79% for QHDG.

THEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THEQ and QHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer