PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THEQ vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THEQ vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THEQ achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.77% return.


THEQ

1D
0.29%
1M
3.15%
YTD
7.47%
6M
7.42%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAOS

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
0.77%
6M
0.63%
1Y
1.85%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THEQ vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
THEQ
T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF
7.47%12.87%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.77%1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between THEQ and CAOS is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

-0.36

THEQ vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THEQ
CAOS

Financial Services

84.3%
12.4%

Technology

3.5%
33.1%

Healthcare

1.5%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
5.4%

Utilities

0.7%
2.6%

Communication Services

0.7%
10.4%

Industrials

0.6%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.6%
10.0%

Energy

0.4%
4.1%

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.0%

Financial Services

THEQ
84.3%
CAOS
12.4%

Technology

THEQ
3.5%
CAOS
33.1%

Healthcare

THEQ
1.5%
CAOS
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

THEQ
0.9%
CAOS
5.4%

Utilities

THEQ
0.7%
CAOS
2.6%

Communication Services

THEQ
0.7%
CAOS
10.4%

Industrials

THEQ
0.6%
CAOS
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

THEQ
0.6%
CAOS
10.0%

Energy

THEQ
0.4%
CAOS
4.1%

Basic Materials

THEQ
0.1%
CAOS
1.9%

Real Estate

THEQ
0.1%
CAOS
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THEQ vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THEQ
THEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
THEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
THEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
THEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
THEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THEQ vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THEQCAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.45

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

6.09

+6.95

THEQ vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THEQ and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THEQCAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.22

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

1.21

+0.33

Drawdowns

THEQ vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.08%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THEQ and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THEQCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-3.60%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-0.76%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.11%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-0.90%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

0.30%

+1.10%

Volatility

THEQ vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.25%. This indicates that THEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THEQCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

0.25%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.47%

1.03%

+5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.65%

1.52%

+7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.54%

4.25%

+7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.54%

4.25%

+7.29%

THEQ vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

THEQ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

THEQ vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

THEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%
THEQ
T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF
0.74%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


THEQ and CAOS have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THEQ has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to CAOS (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THEQ dropped -8.08% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

On 1-year performance, THEQ leads with 18.16% vs 1.85% for CAOS. On fees, THEQ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, THEQ has performed better with a 18.16% return vs 1.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THEQ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

THEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

THEQ is categorized as Equity Hedged, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for THEQ and 0.63% for CAOS.

THEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THEQ and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer