PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THD vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THD vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THD achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, THD has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 3.47%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


THD

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.54%
YTD
24.17%
6M
25.06%
1Y
42.49%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
3.47%

IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THD vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
24.17%2.36%-2.21%-12.63%1.22%1.87%-9.89%8.32%-8.25%31.45%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between THD and IWM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2008

0.49

The correlation between THD and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

THD vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THD
IWM

Industrials

29.3%
17.1%

Energy

14.3%
6.0%

Financial Services

11.2%
15.8%

Communication Services

10.3%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
2.1%

Utilities

6.7%
3.0%

Healthcare

6.4%
15.8%

Real Estate

5.1%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
7.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
4.5%

Technology

0.9%
19.5%

Industrials

THD
29.3%
IWM
17.1%

Energy

THD
14.3%
IWM
6.0%

Financial Services

THD
11.2%
IWM
15.8%

Communication Services

THD
10.3%
IWM
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

THD
7.8%
IWM
2.1%

Utilities

THD
6.7%
IWM
3.0%

Healthcare

THD
6.4%
IWM
15.8%

Real Estate

THD
5.1%
IWM
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

THD
4.6%
IWM
7.8%

Basic Materials

THD
3.5%
IWM
4.5%

Technology

THD
0.9%
IWM
19.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THD vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THD
THD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
THD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
THD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
THD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THD vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THDIWMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

2.05

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

2.85

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.56

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.35

12.64

-3.29

THD vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THD and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THDIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.05

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.27

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.48

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.37

-0.18

Drawdowns

THD vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THD drawdown since its inception was -64.22%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THD and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THDIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.22%

-59.05%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-11.03%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.11%

-27.50%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.24%

-31.91%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.32%

-41.13%

-8.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-1.49%

-7.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-10.77%

-7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

3.10%

+1.48%

Volatility

THD vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that THD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THDIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

5.75%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.28%

13.53%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.67%

19.20%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

22.52%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

23.04%

-1.46%

THD vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

THD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

THD vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

THD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
2.71%3.36%3.15%2.92%2.41%3.16%2.31%2.42%2.57%2.16%2.61%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


THD and IWM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THD dropped -64.22% vs IWM's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.93% vs 3.47% for THD. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for THD.

THD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

THD is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. THD tracks MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for THD and 0.19% for IWM.

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THD and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer