PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THD vs. EEMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THD vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THD achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than EEMV's 17.74% return. Over the past 10 years, THD has underperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 3.47%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively higher 6.68% annualized return.


THD

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.54%
YTD
24.17%
6M
25.06%
1Y
42.49%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
3.47%

EEMV

1D
-1.04%
1M
7.00%
YTD
17.74%
6M
18.90%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
6.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THD vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
24.17%2.36%-2.21%-12.63%1.22%1.87%-9.89%8.32%-8.25%31.45%
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
17.74%13.45%7.98%7.75%-13.94%5.05%6.90%7.83%-5.81%27.28%

Correlation

The correlation between THD and EEMV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.68

The correlation between THD and EEMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

THD vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THD
EEMV

Industrials

29.3%
6.7%

Energy

14.3%
3.4%

Financial Services

11.2%
17.7%

Communication Services

10.3%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
6.8%

Utilities

6.7%
4.6%

Healthcare

6.4%
6.2%

Real Estate

5.1%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.1%

Technology

0.9%
28.9%

Industrials

THD
29.3%
EEMV
6.7%

Energy

THD
14.3%
EEMV
3.4%

Financial Services

THD
11.2%
EEMV
17.7%

Communication Services

THD
10.3%
EEMV
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

THD
7.8%
EEMV
6.8%

Utilities

THD
6.7%
EEMV
4.6%

Healthcare

THD
6.4%
EEMV
6.2%

Real Estate

THD
5.1%
EEMV
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

THD
4.6%
EEMV
5.0%

Basic Materials

THD
3.5%
EEMV
3.1%

Technology

THD
0.9%
EEMV
28.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THD vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THD
THD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
THD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
THD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
THD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THD vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THDEEMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

2.04

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

2.89

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.89

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.35

10.79

-1.44

THD vs. EEMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the EEMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THD and EEMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THDEEMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.04

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.47

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.48

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.39

-0.21

Drawdowns

THD vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THD drawdown since its inception was -64.22%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THD and EEMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THDEEMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.22%

-31.56%

-32.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-9.22%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.11%

-12.47%

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.24%

-21.90%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.32%

-31.56%

-17.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-1.08%

-7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-7.97%

-10.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

2.47%

+2.11%

Volatility

THD vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) at 5.78%. This indicates that THD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THDEEMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

5.78%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.28%

11.71%

+6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.67%

13.06%

+9.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

11.85%

+7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

13.86%

+7.72%

THD vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

THD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

THD vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

THD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than EEMV's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
2.25%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
2.71%3.36%3.15%2.92%2.41%3.16%2.31%2.42%2.57%2.16%2.61%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


THD and EEMV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to EEMV (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THD dropped -64.22% vs EEMV's -31.56%.

On 10-year performance, EEMV leads with 6.68% vs 3.47% for THD. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EEMV has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 6.68% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for THD.

THD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.25% for EEMV.

THD tracks MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for THD and 0.25% for EEMV.

EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THD and EEMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer