PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGWIX vs. TGGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGWIX vs. TGGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund (TGWIX) and TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGWIX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than TGGBX's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TGWIX has outperformed TGGBX with an annualized return of 3.04%, while TGGBX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.94% annualized return.


TGWIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.95%
YTD
3.28%
6M
3.79%
1Y
12.88%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
3.04%

TGGBX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
-1.47%
10Y*
0.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGWIX vs. TGGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGWIX
TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund
3.28%21.09%-3.66%13.22%-12.30%-9.32%1.78%12.91%-8.22%16.28%
TGGBX
TCW Global Bond Fund
-0.60%10.17%-2.27%7.01%-17.09%-4.71%12.29%8.36%-1.75%6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TGWIX and TGGBX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.50

The correlation between TGWIX and TGGBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGWIX vs. TGGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGWIX
TGWIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TGWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TGWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TGGBX
TGGBX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TGGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TGGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGWIX vs. TGGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund (TGWIX) and TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGWIXTGGBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.07

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

0.45

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

1.17

+4.67

TGWIX vs. TGGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGWIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the TGGBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGWIX and TGGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGWIX vs. TGGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGWIX drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, which is greater than TGGBX's maximum drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGWIX and TGGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGWIXTGGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.56%

-27.37%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-4.16%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.85%

-8.55%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

-26.20%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.28%

-27.37%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-9.69%

+8.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.46%

-6.48%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.59%

+0.57%

Volatility

TGWIX vs. TGGBX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund (TGWIX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) at 1.42%. This indicates that TGWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGWIXTGGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

1.42%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

4.13%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.55%

5.17%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.53%

6.81%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.05%

5.80%

+3.25%

TGWIX vs. TGGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGWIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TGGBX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGWIX vs. TGGBX - Dividend Comparison

TGWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than TGGBX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TGGBX
TCW Global Bond Fund
4.20%4.12%2.99%3.65%1.97%1.93%3.70%4.18%0.50%1.88%2.91%2.25%
TGWIX
TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund
5.95%5.66%6.00%3.81%2.70%3.93%0.37%1.66%4.16%6.50%0.00%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGWIX and TGGBX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGWIX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to TGGBX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGWIX dropped -31.56% vs TGGBX's -27.37%.

TGWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGWIX and TGGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer