TGVOX vs. FSLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX).
TGVOX is managed by TCW. It was launched on Oct 31, 1997. FSLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1983.
Performance
TGVOX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TGVOX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGVOX TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund | 5.79% | 15.53% | 17.26% | 15.99% | -11.80% | 31.99% | 3.66% | 29.34% | -22.17% | 19.74% |
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 6.38% | 0.24% | 9.25% | 20.54% | -7.37% | 33.32% | 8.24% | 34.54% | -16.90% | 17.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGVOX achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TGVOX has outperformed FSLSX with an annualized return of 11.47%, while FSLSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.
TGVOX
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
FSLSX
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 14.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TGVOX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGVOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TGVOX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank
TGVOX
FSLSX
TGVOX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGVOX | FSLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 0.66 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 1.05 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.91 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 3.45 | +4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGVOX | FSLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 0.66 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.39 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.48 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.52 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between TGVOX and FSLSX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TGVOX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison
TGVOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGVOX TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund | 20.51% | 21.70% | 9.54% | 2.34% | 2.54% | 12.69% | 0.75% | 2.43% | 9.90% | 8.25% | 0.56% | 16.12% |
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.41% | 2.49% | 2.13% | 7.29% | 0.84% | 4.84% | 14.59% | 6.57% | 19.71% | 1.26% |
Drawdowns
TGVOX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGVOX drawdown since its inception was -58.14%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGVOX and FSLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGVOX | FSLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.14% | -69.87% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -15.25% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.81% | -26.81% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.10% | -47.98% | -3.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.22% | -7.23% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.35% | -8.30% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 4.03% | -0.54% |
Volatility
TGVOX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) is 5.75%, while Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that TGVOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TGVOX | FSLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 6.17% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 15.20% | -3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.80% | 23.98% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 20.47% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 21.89% | +0.44% |