TGT vs. UVV
TGT (Target Corporation) and UVV (Universal Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — TGT in Discount Stores, UVV in Tobacco. Over the past 10 years, TGT returned 9.52%/yr vs 3.97%/yr for UVV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGT vs. UVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGT achieves a 40.98% return, which is significantly higher than UVV's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, TGT has outperformed UVV with an annualized return of 9.52%, while UVV has yielded a comparatively lower 3.97% annualized return.
TGT
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 30.60%
- YTD
- 40.98%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- -8.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
UVV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- -6.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.97%
TGT vs. UVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGT Target Corporation | 40.98% | -24.50% | -2.27% | -1.35% | -34.24% | 32.91% | 40.47% | 100.17% | 4.67% | -5.84% |
UVV Universal Corporation | 0.93% | 2.27% | -13.39% | 35.79% | 1.82% | 19.59% | -8.96% | 11.08% | 7.79% | -14.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGT and UVV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1988 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
TGT:
$61.37B
UVV:
$1.29B
TGT:
$7.93
UVV:
$1.94
TGT:
17.04
UVV:
26.55
TGT:
0.58
UVV:
0.39
TGT:
$105.47B
UVV:
$2.21B
TGT:
$27.05B
UVV:
$412.39M
TGT:
$8.20B
UVV:
$212.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGT vs. UVV — Risk / Return Rank
TGT
UVV
TGT vs. UVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Corporation (TGT) and Universal Corporation (UVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGT | UVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.97 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | -0.47 | +2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | -0.86 | +4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGT vs. UVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGT drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, smaller than the maximum UVV drawdown of -69.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGT and UVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGT | UVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.40% | -69.75% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.27% | -13.48% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.78% | -29.70% | -20.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.40% | -29.70% | -34.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.40% | -45.68% | -18.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.37% | -16.14% | -25.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.14% | -18.58% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 7.37% | +1.35% |
Volatility
TGT vs. UVV - Volatility Comparison
Target Corporation (TGT) has a higher volatility of 12.13% compared to Universal Corporation (UVV) at 5.95%. This indicates that TGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGT | UVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.13% | 5.95% | +6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.22% | 19.06% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.96% | 23.85% | +7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.82% | 24.59% | +11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 28.94% | +4.51% |
Dividends
TGT vs. UVV - Dividend Comparison
TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than UVV's 6.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGT Target Corporation | 3.37% | 4.62% | 3.28% | 3.06% | 2.66% | 1.37% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 3.81% | 3.74% | 3.21% | 2.97% |
UVV Universal Corporation | 6.35% | 6.18% | 5.87% | 4.72% | 5.95% | 5.64% | 6.30% | 5.29% | 4.80% | 4.11% | 3.33% | 3.71% |
Financials
TGT vs. UVV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Target Corporation and Universal Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TGT and UVV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGT has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to UVV (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGT dropped -64.40% vs UVV's -69.75%.
TGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGT and UVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer