TGT vs. DBC
TGT (Target Corporation) is a stock, while DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) is Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Over the past 10 years, TGT returned 9.56%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for DBC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGT vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGT achieves a 40.59% return, which is significantly higher than DBC's 26.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TGT has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 9.56%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.42% annualized return.
TGT
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 29.48%
- YTD
- 40.59%
- 1Y
- 34.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- -9.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
DBC
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 22.16%
- YTD
- 26.70%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
TGT vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGT Target Corporation | 40.59% | -24.50% | -2.27% | -1.35% | -34.24% | 32.91% | 40.47% | 100.17% | 4.67% | -5.84% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 26.70% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGT and DBC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.11 |
The correlation between TGT and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGT vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
TGT
DBC
TGT vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Corporation (TGT) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGT | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.83 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.02 | 6.41 | -2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGT vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGT drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGT and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGT | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.40% | -76.36% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.27% | -16.54% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.78% | -16.54% | -33.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.40% | -27.34% | -37.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.40% | -41.71% | -22.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.53% | -26.71% | -14.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.14% | -46.13% | +28.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 4.71% | +4.01% |
Volatility
TGT vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Target Corporation (TGT) has a higher volatility of 12.12% compared to Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) at 6.07%. This indicates that TGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGT | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.12% | 6.07% | +6.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.10% | 16.67% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.95% | 18.84% | +12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.83% | 19.28% | +16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.46% | 17.80% | +15.66% |
Dividends
TGT vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than DBC's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.63% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGT Target Corporation | 3.38% | 4.62% | 3.28% | 3.06% | 2.66% | 1.37% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 3.81% | 3.74% | 3.21% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGT and DBC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGT has higher volatility (12.12%) compared to DBC (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGT dropped -64.40% vs DBC's -76.36%.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGT and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer