PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRO.TO achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than TCSH.TO's 0.87% return.


TGRO.TO

1D
0.66%
1M
5.30%
YTD
10.65%
6M
10.15%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*

TCSH.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.16%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
10.65%18.03%16.55%
TCSH.TO
TD Cash Management ETF
0.87%3.09%4.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRO.TO and TCSH.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TCSH.TO
TCSH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TCSH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGRO.TOTCSH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

2.88

-1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

26.84

-23.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.25

109.01

-92.76

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is lower than the TCSH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRO.TO and TCSH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGRO.TOTCSH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

5.84

-3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

5.34

-5.24

Drawdowns

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, which is greater than TCSH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRO.TO and TCSH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRO.TOTCSH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-0.54%

-17.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-0.10%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-0.01%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

0.02%

+1.61%

Volatility

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO) at 0.11%. This indicates that TGRO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCSH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRO.TOTCSH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

0.11%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

0.37%

+7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

0.46%

+9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.69%

0.69%

+11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

994.74%

0.69%

+994.05%

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRO.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TCSH.TO's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TGRO.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Dividend Comparison

TGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than TCSH.TO's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TCSH.TO
TD Cash Management ETF
2.59%3.03%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
1.77%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGRO.TO and TCSH.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for TCSH.TO.

TGRO.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while TCSH.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TGRO.TO and 0.16% for TCSH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRO.TO and TCSH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer