PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TGRO.TO (TD Growth ETF Portfolio) and MGRW.TO (Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TGRO.TO returned 13.26%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for MGRW.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TGRO.TO having a 9.93% return and MGRW.TO slightly lower at 9.90%.

TGRO.TO

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.81%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
—

MGRW.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
4.67%
YTD
9.90%
6M
10.22%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio		9.93%18.03%22.28%18.36%-11.39%20.46%7.44%
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF		9.90%18.19%21.41%15.35%-9.30%13.37%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRO.TO and MGRW.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.49

The correlation between TGRO.TO and MGRW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TD Growth ETF Portfolio

Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF

Often compared with TGRO.TO:
TGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOTGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOTGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TOTGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TOTGRO.TO vs. TBAL.TOTGRO.TO vs. TEQT.TOTGRO.TO vs. TPU.TO
Often compared with MGRW.TO:
MGRW.TO vs. MAAA.TOMGRW.TO vs. PYF.TOMGRW.TO vs. QDXH.TOMGRW.TO vs. VGRO.TOMGRW.TO vs. QTIP.NEOMGRW.TO vs. WSHR.NEOMGRW.TO vs. XBAL.TO

Return for Risk

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO
MGRW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TGRO.TOMGRW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.58
2.64

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.62
3.96

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.56

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.87

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.71

15.91

-0.20

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRO.TO and MGRW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TGRO.TOMGRW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

1.14

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

1.25

-1.15

Drawdowns

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, which is greater than MGRW.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRO.TO and MGRW.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TGRO.TOMGRW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-17.20%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-6.72%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.27%

-12.17%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-17.20%

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

0.00%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-3.37%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.63%

0.00%

Volatility

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TGRO.TOMGRW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.39%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

8.09%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.93%

9.87%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.69%

10.68%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

995.08%

10.49%

+984.59%

Dividends

TGRO.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Dividend Comparison

TGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than MGRW.TO's 1.73% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF		1.73%1.84%1.93%2.28%2.44%1.77%0.79%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio		1.78%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

TGRO.TO and MGRW.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: TD and Mackenzie.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRO.TO and MGRW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer