PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRO.TO vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TGRO.TO is traded in CAD, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRO.TO achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.56% return.


TGRO.TO

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.81%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*

ACWI

1D
-0.42%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.56%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
9.93%18.03%22.28%18.36%-11.39%20.46%2,565.79%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
13.56%16.80%27.54%19.58%-12.57%17.59%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRO.TO and ACWI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020

0.82

The correlation between TGRO.TO and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGRO.TOACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.48

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.83

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.71

15.59

+0.12

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRO.TO and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGRO.TOACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.53

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.91

-0.81

Drawdowns

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRO.TO and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRO.TOACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-27.29%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-8.08%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.27%

-16.34%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-21.20%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.42%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-3.58%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.98%

-0.35%

Volatility

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) is 3.28%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that TGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRO.TOACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.80%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

9.91%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.93%

12.26%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.69%

13.66%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

995.08%

14.87%

+980.21%

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRO.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGRO.TO vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

TGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
1.78%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGRO.TO and ACWI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

TGRO.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ACWI is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TGRO.TO and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRO.TO and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer