TGRGX vs. IMLAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TGRGX (Transamerica International Focus) and IMLAX (Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund) are both mutual funds - TGRGX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Transamerica, while IMLAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Transamerica. Over the past 5 years, TGRGX returned 0.13%/yr vs 7.30%/yr for IMLAX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TGRGX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IMLAX.

Performance

TGRGX vs. IMLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica International Focus (TGRGX) and Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRGX achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than IMLAX's 7.58% return.

TGRGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: 4.34%
• 6M: 5.30%
• 1Y: 0.36%
• 3Y*: 5.71%
• 5Y*: 0.13%
• 10Y*: —

IMLAX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 4.04%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 8.43%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: 7.30%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRGX vs. IMLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TGRGX Transamerica International Focus	4.34%	6.79%	-0.73%	12.65%	-20.27%	10.78%	21.16%	14.39%
IMLAX Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund	7.58%	17.98%	13.11%	15.70%	-17.36%	11.37%	16.92%	8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRGX and IMLAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019	0.87

The correlation between TGRGX and IMLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TGRGX vs. IMLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRGX

TGRGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
TGRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TGRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TGRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TGRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TGRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

IMLAX

IMLAX Risk / Return Rank: 54
IMLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IMLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IMLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IMLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IMLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRGX vs. IMLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica International Focus (TGRGX) and Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGRGX	IMLAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	2.13	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	3.02	-2.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.39	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.01	2.76	-2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.01	12.25	-12.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGRGX vs. IMLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the IMLAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRGX and IMLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGRGX	IMLAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	2.13	-2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.61	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.51	-0.19

Drawdowns

TGRGX vs. IMLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRGX drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum IMLAX drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRGX and IMLAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGRGX	IMLAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-46.65%	+11.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.12%	-7.62%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.88%	-12.99%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.46%	-25.32%	-9.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.01%	0.00%	-4.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.56%	-6.71%	-2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.54%	1.72%	+4.82%

Volatility

TGRGX vs. IMLAX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica International Focus (TGRGX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX) at 2.76%. This indicates that TGRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGRGX	IMLAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	2.76%	+1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.73%	7.88%	+4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	9.90%	+5.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.67%	11.98%	+5.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	12.16%	+7.15%

TGRGX vs. IMLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IMLAX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGRGX vs. IMLAX - Dividend Comparison

TGRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IMLAX's 6.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMLAX Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund	6.42%	6.90%	6.44%	3.39%	3.62%	8.40%	4.06%	7.35%	15.09%	9.95%	6.99%	7.99%
TGRGX Transamerica International Focus	0.87%	0.91%	20.50%	8.42%	1.74%	5.85%	0.78%	1.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGRGX and IMLAX in my portfolio?

TGRGX and IMLAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TGRGX or IMLAX?

TGRGX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to IMLAX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRGX dropped -35.21% vs IMLAX's -46.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.