TGLB vs. WLDR
TGLB (T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF) and WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, TGLB returned 13.13% vs 57.08% for WLDR. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGLB charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for WLDR.
Performance
TGLB vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGLB achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than WLDR's 32.24% return.
TGLB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WLDR
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 31.44%
- 1Y
- 57.08%
- 3Y*
- 32.50%
- 5Y*
- 18.98%
- 10Y*
- —
TGLB vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 8.78% | 3.99% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 32.24% | 18.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLB and WLDR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.72 |
TGLB vs. WLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGLB
WLDR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
TGLB
WLDR
Financial Services
TGLB
WLDR
Communication Services
TGLB
WLDR
Industrials
TGLB
WLDR
Healthcare
TGLB
WLDR
Consumer Cyclical
TGLB
WLDR
Basic Materials
TGLB
WLDR
Utilities
TGLB
WLDR
Energy
TGLB
WLDR
Consumer Defensive
TGLB
WLDR
Real Estate
TGLB
-
WLDR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLB vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank
TGLB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WLDR
TGLB vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGLB | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.59 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGLB vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLB drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum WLDR drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLB and WLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLB | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -44.69% | +34.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -8.86% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -0.49% | -3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -8.58% | +6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility
TGLB vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLB | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 16.27% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 17.41% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 21.00% | -6.79% |
TGLB vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLB has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLB vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison
TGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than WLDR's 7.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 7.03% | 9.01% | 13.99% | 2.28% | 2.10% | 7.55% | 1.80% | 2.48% | 2.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLB and WLDR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, WLDR leads with 57.08% vs 13.13% for TGLB. On fees, TGLB is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 57.08% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TGLB is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.
WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.03%, compared with 0.18% for TGLB.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TGLB and 0.67% for WLDR.
Find the right allocation for TGLB and WLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer