PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

TGGR.TO (TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF) and GEQT.TO (iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TGGR.TO returned 12.28%/yr vs 14.52%/yr for GEQT.TO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGGR.TO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GEQT.TO.

Performance

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF (TGGR.TO) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGGR.TO achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly lower than GEQT.TO's 18.33% return.

TGGR.TO

1D
1.07%
1M
5.64%
YTD
13.94%
6M
13.58%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*
—

GEQT.TO

1D
1.15%
1M
4.70%
YTD
18.33%
6M
17.61%
1Y
29.22%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TGGR.TO
TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF		13.94%9.22%22.80%25.77%-16.26%26.36%9.38%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		18.33%17.86%25.42%22.35%-15.19%21.99%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TGGR.TO and GEQT.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020

0.50

Over the past year, TGGR.TO and GEQT.TO have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TGGR.TO
GEQT.TO

Technology

31.6%
44.5%

Financial Services

13.1%
33.4%

Healthcare

13.0%
2.3%

Industrials

10.4%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
2.7%

Communication Services

8.2%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
2.0%

Energy

2.5%
0.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.4%
5.5%

Utilities

0.6%
1.1%

Technology

TGGR.TO
31.6%
GEQT.TO
44.5%

Financial Services

TGGR.TO
13.1%
GEQT.TO
33.4%

Healthcare

TGGR.TO
13.0%
GEQT.TO
2.3%

Industrials

TGGR.TO
10.4%
GEQT.TO
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TGGR.TO
9.4%
GEQT.TO
2.7%

Communication Services

TGGR.TO
8.2%
GEQT.TO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

TGGR.TO
4.2%
GEQT.TO
2.0%

Energy

TGGR.TO
2.5%
GEQT.TO
0.0%

Real Estate

TGGR.TO
1.7%
GEQT.TO
1.1%

Basic Materials

TGGR.TO
1.4%
GEQT.TO
5.5%

Utilities

TGGR.TO
0.6%
GEQT.TO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF

iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with TGGR.TO:
TGGR.TO vs. TGED.TOTGGR.TO vs. TTP.TOTGGR.TO vs. XDGH.TOTGGR.TO vs. XMW.TOTGGR.TO vs. MEQT.TOTGGR.TO vs. TEQT.TOTGGR.TO vs. TPE.TO
Often compared with GEQT.TO:
GEQT.TO vs. XEQT.TOGEQT.TO vs. GGRO.TOGEQT.TO vs. ZAG.TOGEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. XEN.TOGEQT.TO vs. XBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. VT

Return for Risk

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TGGR.TO
TGGR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TGGR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGGR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGGR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TGGR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGGR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO
GEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF (TGGR.TO) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TGGR.TOGEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.98
2.01

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.91
2.77

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.16

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

12.85

-3.42

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGGR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGGR.TO and GEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, which is greater than GEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGGR.TO and GEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TGGR.TOGEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.61%

-23.66%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-9.29%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.71%

-18.02%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.61%

-23.66%

-3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-5.06%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.28%

+0.46%

Volatility

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF (TGGR.TO) is 3.96%, while iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that TGGR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TGGR.TOGEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

5.93%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

12.28%

-1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

14.61%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

17.66%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

17.35%

-1.84%

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGGR.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than GEQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGGR.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

TGGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than GEQT.TO's 1.12% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		1.12%1.26%1.38%1.58%1.82%1.32%0.87%
TGGR.TO
TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF		0.49%0.56%0.52%0.56%0.55%0.32%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

TGGR.TO and GEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for TGGR.TO.

They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for TGGR.TO and 0.25% for GEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGGR.TO and GEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer