TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO
TGGR.TO (TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF) and CIE.NEO (iShares International Fundamental Common Class) are both Global Equities funds. TGGR.TO is actively managed, while CIE.NEO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TGGR.TO returned 12.10%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for CIE.NEO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TGGR.TO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for CIE.NEO.
Performance
TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGGR.TO achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than CIE.NEO's 17.83% return.
TGGR.TO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- —
CIE.NEO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 39.49%
- 3Y*
- 25.09%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGGR.TO TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF | 8.54% | 9.22% | 22.80% | 25.77% | -16.26% | 26.36% | 16.55% |
CIE.NEO iShares International Fundamental Common Class | 17.83% | 34.92% | 12.83% | 15.59% | -2.83% | 14.42% | 12.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGGR.TO and CIE.NEO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.44 |
The correlation between TGGR.TO and CIE.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
TGGR.TO
CIE.NEO
TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF (TGGR.TO) and iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGGR.TO | CIE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.54 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.57 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 14.78 | -6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGGR.TO | CIE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.85 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 1.13 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.44 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, smaller than the maximum CIE.NEO drawdown of -40.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGGR.TO and CIE.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGGR.TO | CIE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.61% | -40.08% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -11.10% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.71% | -15.44% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.61% | -20.55% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.39% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -7.13% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.68% | +0.07% |
Volatility
TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF (TGGR.TO) is 2.90%, while iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that TGGR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIE.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGGR.TO | CIE.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 4.85% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 11.56% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 13.95% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 13.85% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 18.19% | -2.85% |
TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGGR.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CIE.NEO's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGGR.TO vs. CIE.NEO - Dividend Comparison
TGGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than CIE.NEO's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIE.NEO iShares International Fundamental Common Class | 2.12% | 2.53% | 2.82% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 2.89% | 2.15% | 3.63% | 3.12% | 2.67% | 2.80% | 2.44% |
TGGR.TO TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.52% | 0.55% | 0.55% | 0.32% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGGR.TO and CIE.NEO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TGGR.TO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TGGR.TO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CIE.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for TGGR.TO and 0.73% for CIE.NEO.
Find the right allocation for TGGR.TO and CIE.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer