TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TGGR.TO (TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF) and BREA.TO (Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TGGR.TO returned 12.10%/yr vs 14.53%/yr for BREA.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TGGR.TO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BREA.TO.

Performance

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF (TGGR.TO) and Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGGR.TO achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than BREA.TO's 14.61% return.

TGGR.TO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 5.53%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 22.78%
• 3Y*: 17.31%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: —

BREA.TO

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 14.61%
• 6M: 14.48%
• 1Y: 26.76%
• 3Y*: 23.21%
• 5Y*: 14.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TGGR.TO TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF	8.54%	9.22%	22.80%	25.77%	-16.26%	26.36%	16.55%
BREA.TO Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF	14.61%	21.56%	23.40%	6.31%	-2.35%	18.66%	4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TGGR.TO and BREA.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.29

The correlation between TGGR.TO and BREA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TGGR.TO	BREA.TO
Technology	32.9%	4.8%
Financial Services	13.8%	-
Healthcare	13.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	-
Communication Services	9.1%	9.9%
Industrials	8.2%	45.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	-
Energy	2.9%	19.9%
Basic Materials	2.5%	5.4%
Real Estate	1.7%	4.1%
Utilities	-	10.1%

Return for Risk

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGGR.TO

TGGR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 52
TGGR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
TGGR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
TGGR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
TGGR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TGGR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BREA.TO

BREA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 60
BREA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
BREA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BREA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BREA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BREA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF (TGGR.TO) and Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGGR.TO	BREA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.92	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.67	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.25	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.31	11.21	-2.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGGR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the BREA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGGR.TO and BREA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGGR.TO	BREA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	1.92	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.89	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.96	-0.01

Drawdowns

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, which is greater than BREA.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGGR.TO and BREA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGGR.TO	BREA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.61%	-19.15%	-8.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.18%	-8.35%	-1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.71%	-16.36%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.61%	-19.15%	-8.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-2.33%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-4.40%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	2.42%	+0.33%

Volatility

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF (TGGR.TO) is 2.90%, while Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF (BREA.TO) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that TGGR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BREA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGGR.TO	BREA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	4.70%	-1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.42%	11.30%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.86%	14.19%	-1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.55%	16.34%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.34%	15.68%	-0.34%

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGGR.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BREA.TO's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGGR.TO vs. BREA.TO - Dividend Comparison

TGGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than BREA.TO's 4.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BREA.TO Brompton Sustainable Real Assets Dividend ETF	4.85%	4.95%	4.89%	5.17%	4.81%	4.12%	3.08%
TGGR.TO TD Active Global Equity Growth ETF	0.52%	0.56%	0.52%	0.55%	0.55%	0.32%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGGR.TO and BREA.TO in my portfolio?

TGGR.TO and BREA.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TGGR.TO or BREA.TO?

On fees, TGGR.TO is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TGGR.TO or BREA.TO?

TGGR.TO is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BREA.TO.

What is the main difference between TGGR.TO and BREA.TO?

They also come from different issuers: TD and Brompton Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for TGGR.TO and 0.96% for BREA.TO.