TGGBX vs. TGCFX
Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) and TCW Core Fixed Income Fund (TGCFX).
TGGBX is managed by TCW. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011. TGCFX is managed by TCW. It was launched on Feb 26, 1993.
Performance
TGGBX vs. TGCFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TGGBX vs. TGCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGGBX TCW Global Bond Fund | -1.43% | 10.17% | -2.27% | 7.01% | -17.09% | -4.71% | 12.29% | 8.36% | -1.75% | 6.02% |
TGCFX TCW Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.32% | 7.51% | 0.75% | 5.61% | -14.25% | -1.27% | 8.79% | 8.75% | 0.09% | 3.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGGBX achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly lower than TGCFX's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TGGBX has underperformed TGCFX with an annualized return of 1.02%, while TGCFX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.65% annualized return.
TGGBX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- -1.43%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
TGCFX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 1.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TGGBX vs. TGCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGGBX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TGCFX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TGGBX vs. TGCFX — Risk / Return Rank
TGGBX
TGCFX
TGGBX vs. TGCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) and TCW Core Fixed Income Fund (TGCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGGBX | TGCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.83 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.48 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 3.88 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGGBX | TGCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.83 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | -0.03 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.32 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.33 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between TGGBX and TGCFX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TGGBX vs. TGCFX - Dividend Comparison
TGGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than TGCFX's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGGBX TCW Global Bond Fund | 3.96% | 4.12% | 2.99% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.93% | 3.70% | 4.18% | 0.50% | 1.88% | 2.91% | 2.25% |
TGCFX TCW Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.11% | 4.51% | 4.34% | 3.66% | 2.22% | 1.56% | 4.14% | 2.63% | 2.57% | 2.17% | 2.95% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
TGGBX vs. TGCFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGGBX drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, which is greater than TGCFX's maximum drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGGBX and TGCFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGGBX | TGCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.37% | -19.37% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.16% | -2.79% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.20% | -19.37% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -19.37% | -8.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -3.51% | -6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -3.61% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 1.07% | +0.10% |
Volatility
TGGBX vs. TGCFX - Volatility Comparison
TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to TCW Core Fixed Income Fund (TGCFX) at 1.76%. This indicates that TGGBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TGGBX | TGCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 1.76% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.26% | 2.80% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.41% | 4.65% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.71% | 6.52% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 5.20% | +0.55% |