TGFRX vs. VLIFX
TGFRX (Tanaka Growth Fund) and VLIFX (Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TGFRX returned 15.05%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for VLIFX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGFRX charges 2.19%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for VLIFX.
Performance
TGFRX vs. VLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGFRX achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than VLIFX's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TGFRX has outperformed VLIFX with an annualized return of 15.05%, while VLIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.59% annualized return.
TGFRX
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 42.60%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
VLIFX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 0.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
TGFRX vs. VLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 13.93% | 39.56% | 17.98% | 50.24% | -22.62% | 26.54% | 50.87% | 18.78% | -25.18% | 7.28% |
VLIFX Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund | 0.80% | 0.79% | 7.59% | 22.11% | -9.60% | 19.76% | 19.96% | 35.30% | 4.65% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGFRX and VLIFX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TGFRX and VLIFX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGFRX vs. VLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
TGFRX
VLIFX
TGFRX vs. VLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGFRX | VLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | -0.04 | +2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.64 | -0.11 | +6.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGFRX vs. VLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGFRX drawdown since its inception was -74.43%, which is greater than VLIFX's maximum drawdown of -61.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGFRX and VLIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGFRX | VLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.43% | -61.48% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.01% | -11.81% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.68% | -17.66% | -44.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.68% | -21.91% | -39.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.68% | -35.51% | -26.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.93% | -6.75% | -23.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -15.64% | -13.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.44% | 4.34% | +2.10% |
Volatility
TGFRX vs. VLIFX - Volatility Comparison
Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund (VLIFX) at 2.60%. This indicates that TGFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGFRX | VLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 2.60% | +5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.23% | 10.03% | +13.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.85% | 13.49% | +17.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.23% | 16.87% | +45.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.48% | 17.82% | +29.66% |
TGFRX vs. VLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGFRX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VLIFX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGFRX vs. VLIFX - Dividend Comparison
TGFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.43%, more than VLIFX's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 11.43% | 13.02% | 6.89% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 7.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VLIFX Value Line Mid Cap Focused Fund | 2.14% | 2.16% | 0.99% | 0.03% | 7.22% | 8.23% | 7.81% | 1.42% | 5.12% | 1.61% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGFRX and VLIFX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGFRX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to VLIFX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGFRX dropped -74.43% vs VLIFX's -61.48%.
TGFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGFRX and VLIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer