PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGEIX vs. PYELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGEIX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund (TGEIX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGEIX achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's 2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TGEIX has underperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 4.28%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.38% annualized return.


TGEIX

1D
0.14%
1M
2.81%
YTD
5.20%
6M
5.89%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
4.28%

PYELX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.74%
YTD
2.22%
6M
3.35%
1Y
11.43%
3Y*
34.95%
5Y*
17.64%
10Y*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGEIX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGEIX
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund
5.20%14.59%7.33%12.10%-17.54%-5.07%5.13%15.86%-6.16%11.40%
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
2.22%139.58%-3.48%13.16%-11.28%-7.83%1.79%13.92%-8.16%15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TGEIX and PYELX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.56

The correlation between TGEIX and PYELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGEIX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGEIX
TGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PYELX
PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGEIX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund (TGEIX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGEIXPYELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.33

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

1.54

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.78

4.97

+10.80

TGEIX vs. PYELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGEIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is higher than the PYELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGEIX and PYELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGEIX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGEIX drawdown since its inception was -46.33%, which is greater than PYELX's maximum drawdown of -35.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGEIX and PYELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGEIXPYELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.33%

-35.29%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.56%

-7.22%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.53%

-9.49%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

-24.24%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.74%

-26.58%

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.61%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.23%

-16.39%

+9.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.23%

-1.23%

Volatility

TGEIX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund (TGEIX) is 1.23%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 2.17%. This indicates that TGEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGEIXPYELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

2.17%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

5.85%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36%

6.71%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

45.34%

-38.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.71%

32.71%

-25.00%

TGEIX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGEIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGEIX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison

TGEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, less than PYELX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
7.11%6.28%7.08%5.38%5.93%5.36%4.69%5.46%6.67%6.15%5.44%5.26%
TGEIX
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund
6.12%6.12%6.67%5.23%5.07%4.88%4.00%4.92%4.59%5.47%5.16%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGEIX and PYELX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYELX has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to TGEIX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGEIX dropped -46.33% vs PYELX's -35.29%.

TGEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGEIX and PYELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer