PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TG vs. RYZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TG vs. RYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tredegar Corporation (TG) and Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TG

1D
-2.75%
1M
-18.30%
YTD
8.22%
6M
-4.78%
1Y
-9.02%
3Y*
1.16%
5Y*
-11.19%
10Y*
-1.57%

RYZ

1D
-1.27%
1M
7.01%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TG vs. RYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TG and RYZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026

0.60

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TG:

$269.59M

RYZ:

$1.21B

EPS

TG:

$0.84

RYZ:

-$1.32

PS Ratio

TG:

0.36

RYZ:

0.20

PB Ratio

TG:

1.20

RYZ:

0.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

TG:

$744.62M

RYZ:

$5.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TG:

$77.37M

RYZ:

$863.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

TG:

$52.75M

RYZ:

$70.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Tredegar Corporation

Ryerson Holding Corporation

Return for Risk

TG vs. RYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TG
TG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
TG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RYZ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TG vs. RYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tredegar Corporation (TG) and Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGRYZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

TG vs. RYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGRYZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.29

-0.16

Drawdowns

TG vs. RYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TG drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, which is greater than RYZ's maximum drawdown of -27.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TG and RYZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRYZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.46%

-27.63%

-47.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.46%

-1.85%

-50.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.50%

-10.60%

-22.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.83%

Volatility

TG vs. RYZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRYZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.85%

51.54%

-5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.49%

51.54%

-7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.52%

51.54%

-6.02%

Dividends

TG vs. RYZ - Dividend Comparison

TG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYZ
Ryerson Holding Corporation
0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TG
Tredegar Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.81%4.89%4.06%39.34%2.06%2.77%2.29%1.83%3.08%

Financials

TG vs. RYZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tredegar Corporation and Ryerson Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
186.49M
1.57B
(TG) Total Revenue
(RYZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TG vs. RYZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tredegar Corporation and Ryerson Holding Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%202220232024202520260
18.2%
Portfolio components
TG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tredegar Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 186.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RYZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 284.30M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

TG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tredegar Corporation reported an operating income of 5.07M and revenue of 186.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

RYZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

TG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tredegar Corporation reported a net income of 5.66M and revenue of 186.49M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

RYZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported a net income of 4.50M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TG and RYZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TG and RYZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer