TG vs. RYZ
TG (Tredegar Corporation) and RYZ (Ryerson Holding Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Metal Fabrication industry within the Industrials sector. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TG vs. RYZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TG
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- -18.30%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- -4.78%
- 1Y
- -9.02%
- 3Y*
- 1.16%
- 5Y*
- -11.19%
- 10Y*
- -1.57%
RYZ
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 7.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TG vs. RYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TG Tredegar Corporation | -11.90% |
RYZ Ryerson Holding Corporation | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TG and RYZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.60 |
Fundamentals
TG:
$269.59M
RYZ:
$1.21B
TG:
$0.84
RYZ:
-$1.32
TG:
0.36
RYZ:
0.20
TG:
1.20
RYZ:
0.94
TG:
$744.62M
RYZ:
$5.00B
TG:
$77.37M
RYZ:
$863.30M
TG:
$52.75M
RYZ:
$70.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TG vs. RYZ — Risk / Return Rank
TG
RYZ
TG vs. RYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tredegar Corporation (TG) and Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TG | RYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TG | RYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.29 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
TG vs. RYZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TG drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, which is greater than RYZ's maximum drawdown of -27.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TG and RYZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TG | RYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.46% | -27.63% | -47.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.46% | -1.85% | -50.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -10.60% | -22.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.83% | — | — |
Volatility
TG vs. RYZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TG | RYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.85% | 51.54% | -5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.49% | 51.54% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.52% | 51.54% | -6.02% |
Dividends
TG vs. RYZ - Dividend Comparison
TG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYZ Ryerson Holding Corporation | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TG Tredegar Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.81% | 4.89% | 4.06% | 39.34% | 2.06% | 2.77% | 2.29% | 1.83% | 3.08% |
Financials
TG vs. RYZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tredegar Corporation and Ryerson Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TG vs. RYZ - Profitability Comparison
TG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tredegar Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 186.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RYZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 284.30M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.
TG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tredegar Corporation reported an operating income of 5.07M and revenue of 186.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.
RYZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
TG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tredegar Corporation reported a net income of 5.66M and revenue of 186.49M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
RYZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported a net income of 4.50M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TG and RYZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TG and RYZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer