PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFPN vs. JFLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFPN vs. JFLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPN achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly higher than JFLI's 8.43% return.


TFPN

1D
-1.29%
1M
-6.78%
6M
7.37%
YTD
15.77%
1Y
27.48%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
10Y*

JFLI

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.83%
6M
6.39%
YTD
8.43%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFPN vs. JFLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TFPN and JFLI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.59

The correlation between TFPN and JFLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFPN vs. JFLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFPN
TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JFLI
JFLI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
JFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFPN vs. JFLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFPNJFLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.37

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

10.83

-0.87

TFPN vs. JFLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFPN Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the JFLI Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFPN and JFLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFPN vs. JFLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, which is greater than JFLI's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and JFLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFPNJFLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.72%

-12.87%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-6.67%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-1.93%

-7.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-1.41%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

1.46%

+1.30%

Volatility

TFPN vs. JFLI - Volatility Comparison

Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) at 2.94%. This indicates that TFPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JFLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFPNJFLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

2.94%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

8.05%

+4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

9.35%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.05%

11.99%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.05%

11.99%

+1.06%

TFPN vs. JFLI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than JFLI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFPN vs. JFLI - Dividend Comparison

TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JFLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%.


PositionTTM202520242023
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
7.33%6.81%0.00%0.00%
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
0.00%0.00%0.94%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFPN and JFLI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFPN has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to JFLI (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPN dropped -16.72% vs JFLI's -12.87%.

On 1-year performance, TFPN leads with 27.48% vs 15.73% for JFLI. On fees, JFLI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JFLI has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TFPN has performed better with a 27.48% return vs 15.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JFLI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for TFPN.

JFLI has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 0.00% for TFPN.

They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for TFPN and 0.35% for JFLI.

TFPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFPN and JFLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer