TFPN vs. IAU
Compare and contrast key facts about Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU).
TFPN and IAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TFPN is an actively managed fund by Tidal ETFs. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Jan 21, 2005.
Performance
TFPN vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TFPN vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 8.26% | 3.61% | 2.67% | -1.60% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 8.61% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 5.15% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TFPN having a 8.26% return and IAU slightly higher at 8.61%.
TFPN
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- 1Y
- 49.53%
- 3Y*
- 33.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TFPN vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TFPN vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
TFPN
IAU
TFPN vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFPN | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 1.80 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 2.24 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.69 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 9.97 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFPN | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 1.80 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.64 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between TFPN and IAU is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TFPN vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither TFPN nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.98% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TFPN vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and IAU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFPN | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -45.14% | +28.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -19.18% | +11.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -13.20% | +6.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -15.98% | +10.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 5.18% | -2.69% |
Volatility
TFPN vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) is 5.30%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that TFPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TFPN | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 11.02% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 24.11% | -12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 27.62% | -14.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 17.69% | -5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 15.82% | -3.44% |