TFPN vs. EHLS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TFPN (Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF) and EHLS (Even Herd Long Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFPN is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Tidal, while EHLS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Tidal. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TFPN returned 29.78% vs 16.88% for EHLS. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TFPN charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for EHLS.

Performance

TFPN vs. EHLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPN achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than EHLS's 10.15% return.

TFPN

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -1.64%
• 6M: 5.45%
• YTD: 16.44%
• 1Y: 29.78%
• 3Y*: 6.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.62%

EHLS

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -2.28%
• 6M: 2.88%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 1Y: 16.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF	$13.47K	$14.20K	$68.98K
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	$429.91K	$568.98K	$358.90K

TFPN vs. EHLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	16.44%	3.61%	-4.25%
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF	10.15%	6.67%	12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TFPN and EHLS is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.46

The correlation between TFPN and EHLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TFPN vs. EHLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TFPN

TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 75
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 71

EHLS

EHLS Risk / Return Rank: 37
EHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
EHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
EHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TFPN vs. EHLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) and Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TFPN	EHLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	0.81	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	1.19	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.15	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	1.72	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.82	4.40	+4.42

TFPN vs. EHLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFPN Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the EHLS Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFPN and EHLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TFPN vs. EHLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPN drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum EHLS drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPN and EHLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFPN	EHLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.72%	-18.96%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	-9.06%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.40%	-6.17%	-2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.91%	-4.42%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	3.54%	-0.29%

Volatility

TFPN vs. EHLS - Volatility Comparison

Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) at 5.04%. This indicates that TFPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFPN	EHLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	5.04%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	14.84%	-0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	19.19%	-2.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	19.56%	-6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.35%	19.56%	-6.21%

TFPN vs. EHLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFPN has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EHLS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFPN vs. EHLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TFPN nor EHLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.03%	0.00%
TFPN Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFPN and EHLS in my portfolio?

TFPN and EHLS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFPN or EHLS?

TFPN has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to EHLS (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPN dropped -16.72% vs EHLS's -18.96%.

Which ETF is better, TFPN or EHLS?

On 1-year performance, TFPN leads with 29.78% vs 16.88% for EHLS. On fees, TFPN is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, EHLS has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TFPN or EHLS?

Over the 1-year period, TFPN has performed better with a 29.78% return vs 16.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFPN or EHLS?

TFPN is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFPN or EHLS?

TFPN and EHLS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TFPN and EHLS?

TFPN is categorized as Global Allocation, while EHLS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for TFPN and 1.58% for EHLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TFPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.