PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFPM vs. TFPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFPM vs. TFPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPM achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly lower than TFPN's 27.01% return.


TFPM

1D
-3.43%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
-9.80%
6M
-7.74%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
29.62%
5Y*
10Y*

TFPN

1D
0.91%
1M
5.79%
YTD
27.01%
6M
28.49%
1Y
45.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFPM vs. TFPN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
-9.80%123.03%14.60%-3.78%
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
27.01%3.61%2.67%-1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TFPM and TFPN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFPM vs. TFPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFPM
TFPM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TFPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TFPN
TFPN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TFPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFPM vs. TFPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFPMTFPNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.60

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

6.19

-5.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

21.51

-19.15

TFPM vs. TFPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the TFPN Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFPM and TFPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFPMTFPNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

3.37

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.83

-0.01

Drawdowns

TFPM vs. TFPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPM drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, which is greater than TFPN's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPM and TFPN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFPMTFPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-16.72%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.55%

-7.47%

-20.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.55%

0.00%

-27.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.32%

-4.89%

-8.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.02%

2.14%

+8.88%

Volatility

TFPM vs. TFPN - Volatility Comparison

Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) at 4.55%. This indicates that TFPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFPMTFPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.34%

4.55%

+10.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.07%

11.50%

+21.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.69%

13.70%

+28.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.27%

12.53%

+24.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

12.53%

+24.74%

Dividends

TFPM vs. TFPN - Dividend Comparison

TFPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while TFPN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
0.77%0.68%1.43%1.54%1.07%0.39%
TFPN
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
0.00%0.00%0.94%0.98%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFPM and TFPN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFPM has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to TFPN (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPM dropped -36.48% vs TFPN's -16.72%.

TFPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFPM and TFPN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer