PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFPM vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TFPM vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPM achieves a -15.14% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's -4.15% return.


TFPM

1D
-1.44%
1M
0.36%
6M
-19.69%
YTD
-15.14%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
29.68%
5Y*
10Y*

NEM

1D
0.51%
1M
-2.36%
6M
-12.19%
YTD
-4.15%
1Y
60.16%
3Y*
32.96%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFPM vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
-15.14%123.03%14.60%-1.81%14.71%32.61%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-4.15%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TFPM and NEM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.54

Over the past year, TFPM and NEM have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TFPM:

$5.81B

NEM:

$101.73B

EPS

TFPM:

$1.50

NEM:

$7.15

PE Ratio

TFPM:

18.71

NEM:

13.33

PEG Ratio

TFPM:

0.14

NEM:

0.35

PS Ratio

TFPM:

12.84

NEM:

4.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

TFPM:

$453.24M

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TFPM:

$337.23M

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

TFPM:

$354.95M

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFPM vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFPM
TFPM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TFPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFPM vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFPMNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

2.09

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

4.81

-3.29

TFPM vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFPM and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFPM vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPM drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPM and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFPMNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-81.30%

+44.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.87%

-29.39%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.87%

-36.57%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.84%

-27.47%

-4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-41.34%

+27.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.19%

12.73%

+1.46%

Volatility

TFPM vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 14.14%. This indicates that TFPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFPMNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.53%

14.14%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.31%

37.29%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.54%

47.74%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.68%

38.15%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.68%

35.73%

+1.95%

Dividends

TFPM vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

TFPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than NEM's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.07%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
0.82%0.68%1.43%1.54%1.07%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TFPM vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
144.96M
0
(TFPM) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TFPM and NEM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFPM has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to NEM (14.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPM dropped -36.48% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFPM and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer