PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFNS vs. TCAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFNS vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly lower than TCAF's 6.51% return.


TFNS

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-5.36%
6M
-2.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TCAF

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.54%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.60%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFNS vs. TCAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TFNS and TCAF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.57

TFNS vs. TCAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TFNS
TCAF

Financial Services

97.1%
6.0%

Technology

1.9%
33.7%

Industrials

0.9%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Energy

-

2.6%

Healthcare

-

17.3%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

8.6%

Financial Services

TFNS
97.1%
TCAF
6.0%

Technology

TFNS
1.9%
TCAF
33.7%

Industrials

TFNS
0.9%
TCAF
4.6%

Basic Materials

TFNS

-

TCAF
0.1%

Communication Services

TFNS

-

TCAF
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TFNS

-

TCAF
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

TFNS

-

TCAF
3.3%

Energy

TFNS

-

TCAF
2.6%

Healthcare

TFNS

-

TCAF
17.3%

Real Estate

TFNS

-

TCAF
0.1%

Utilities

TFNS

-

TCAF
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFNS vs. TCAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFNS

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFNS vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TFNS vs. TCAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFNSTCAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.26

-0.95

Drawdowns

TFNS vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum TCAF drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and TCAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFNSTCAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-16.37%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.00%

-0.97%

-7.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-2.06%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

Volatility

TFNS vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFNSTCAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

11.47%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

13.94%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

13.94%

+1.10%

TFNS vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFNS vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison

TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than TCAF's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.47%0.50%0.43%0.26%
TFNS
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF
0.52%0.49%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFNS and TCAF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.

TFNS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.47% for TCAF.

TFNS is categorized as Financials Equities, while TCAF is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 0.31% for TCAF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFNS and TCAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer