TFNS vs. RSPF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) and RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. TFNS is actively managed, while RSPF is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TFNS charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPF.

Performance

TFNS vs. RSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -3.01% return, which is significantly lower than RSPF's -2.82% return.

TFNS

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: -3.01%
• 6M: 0.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPF

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: -2.82%
• 6M: -0.50%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: 5.89%
• 10Y*: 11.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFNS vs. RSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	-3.01%	10.41%
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	-2.82%	8.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TFNS and RSPF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.93

TFNS vs. RSPF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TFNS	RSPF
Financial Services	97.1%	92.7%
Technology	1.9%	6.1%
Industrials	0.9%	1.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TFNS vs. RSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPF

RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 14
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFNS vs. RSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFNS	RSPF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.22	+0.27

Drawdowns

TFNS vs. RSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum RSPF drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and RSPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFNS	RSPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.00%	-81.32%	+67.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.72%	-5.63%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-19.04%	+15.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TFNS	RSPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.22%	15.26%	-0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	19.88%	-4.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	22.92%	-7.70%

TFNS vs. RSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPF's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFNS vs. RSPF - Dividend Comparison

TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than RSPF's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	1.66%	1.55%	1.65%	2.16%	1.95%	1.56%	2.24%	1.85%	2.51%	1.28%	37.55%	2.17%
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF	0.51%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFNS and RSPF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, TFNS and RSPF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, TFNS or RSPF?

On fees, RSPF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFNS or RSPF?

RSPF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFNS or RSPF?

RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.51% for TFNS.

What is the main difference between TFNS and RSPF?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 0.40% for RSPF.