TFNS vs. KCE
TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) and KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. TFNS is actively managed, while KCE is passively managed. Over the past year, TFNS returned 9.47% vs 5.28% for KCE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TFNS charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KCE.
Performance
TFNS vs. KCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly higher than KCE's -1.20% return.
TFNS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCE
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -3.24%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
TFNS vs. KCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | -0.33% | 11.06% |
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | -1.20% | 10.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFNS and KCE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between TFNS and KCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
TFNS vs. KCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TFNS
KCE
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TFNS
KCE
Technology
TFNS
KCE
Industrials
TFNS
KCE
-
Basic Materials
TFNS
-
KCE
-
Communication Services
TFNS
-
KCE
-
Consumer Cyclical
TFNS
-
KCE
-
Consumer Defensive
TFNS
-
KCE
-
Energy
TFNS
-
KCE
-
Healthcare
TFNS
-
KCE
-
Real Estate
TFNS
-
KCE
-
Utilities
TFNS
-
KCE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFNS vs. KCE — Risk / Return Rank
TFNS
KCE
TFNS vs. KCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFNS | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.06 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 0.30 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 0.78 | +1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFNS vs. KCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum KCE drawdown of -74.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and KCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFNS | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -74.00% | +60.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | -17.44% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -8.27% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -22.75% | +18.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 6.75% | -1.55% |
Volatility
TFNS vs. KCE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) is 4.10%, while SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that TFNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFNS | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 6.35% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 15.48% | -4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 20.05% | -5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 23.08% | -8.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 22.96% | -7.95% |
TFNS vs. KCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than KCE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFNS vs. KCE - Dividend Comparison
TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than KCE's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 1.83% | 1.63% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.42% | 1.53% | 2.20% | 2.32% | 2.67% | 1.95% | 2.30% | 2.43% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFNS and KCE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KCE has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to TFNS (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFNS dropped -14.00% vs KCE's -74.00%.
On 1-year performance, TFNS leads with 9.47% vs 5.28% for KCE. On fees, KCE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TFNS has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TFNS has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 5.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KCE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.
KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.49% for TFNS.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 0.35% for KCE.
TFNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFNS and KCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer