PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFLO vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFLO vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLO achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.


TFLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.90%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
2.37%

AVUV

1D
0.96%
1M
6.47%
YTD
22.73%
6M
19.51%
1Y
42.12%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFLO vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.71%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%0.57%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
22.73%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TFLO and AVUV is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFLO vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFLO vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFLOAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+11.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+48.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

14.07

1.39

+12.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

203.31

5.06

+198.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

831.79

15.09

+816.70

TFLO vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLO Sharpe Ratio is 14.28, which is higher than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLO and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFLO vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLO drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLO and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFLOAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-49.42%

+44.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-7.95%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.04%

-28.79%

+28.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

-28.79%

+28.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-7.91%

+7.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

2.67%

-2.67%

Volatility

TFLO vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) is 0.07%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that TFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFLOAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

4.53%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.20%

11.34%

-11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28%

17.63%

-17.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.35%

22.75%

-22.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.45%

28.26%

-27.81%

TFLO vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TFLO vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than AVUV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.89%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFLO and AVUV have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUV has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLO dropped -5.01% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.57% vs 3.66% for TFLO. On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

TFLO has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.61% for AVUV.

TFLO is categorized as Government Bonds, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TFLO and 0.25% for AVUV.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFLO and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer