TFJL vs. DBE
TFJL (Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TFJL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. TFJL is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TFJL returned -3.76%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for DBE. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. TFJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
TFJL vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFJL achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.
TFJL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -4.14%
- 1Y
- -2.72%
- 3Y*
- -1.72%
- 5Y*
- -3.76%
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 83.68%
- 6M
- 74.95%
- 1Y
- 84.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
TFJL vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -2.35% | -0.81% | -6.79% | 8.23% | -17.17% | -2.46% | -1.98% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 83.68% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFJL and DBE is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2020 | -0.19 |
The correlation between TFJL and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (1 year) to -0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFJL vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
TFJL
DBE
TFJL vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFJL | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.40 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 5.89 | -6.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 11.53 | -12.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFJL | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 2.43 | -2.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.67 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.09 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
TFJL vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFJL drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFJL and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFJL | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.45% | -86.69% | +61.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -14.41% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.72% | -23.89% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | -38.74% | +15.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.83% | -30.27% | +7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.02% | -57.31% | +42.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 7.35% | -3.61% |
Volatility
TFJL vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) is 1.99%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that TFJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFJL | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 12.95% | -10.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.67% | 30.86% | -25.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 34.97% | -26.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.34% | 29.39% | -20.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 28.33% | -19.30% |
TFJL vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFJL vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
TFJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.10% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFJL and DBE have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to TFJL (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFJL dropped -25.45% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 19.66% vs -3.76% for TFJL. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, TFJL has been the lower-risk option at 1.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 19.66% return vs -3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TFJL.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for TFJL.
TFJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TFJL and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFJL and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer