TFJL vs. BOUT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TFJL (Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and BOUT (Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFJL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while BOUT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. TFJL is actively managed, while BOUT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TFJL returned -3.99%/yr vs 7.49%/yr for BOUT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TFJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BOUT.

Performance

TFJL vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFJL achieves a -3.81% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 27.17% return.

TFJL

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -1.96%
• 6M: -4.06%
• YTD: -3.81%
• 1Y: -3.18%
• 3Y*: -1.72%
• 5Y*: -3.99%
• 10Y*: —

BOUT

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -2.85%
• 6M: 19.86%
• YTD: 27.17%
• 1Y: 27.33%
• 3Y*: 13.21%
• 5Y*: 7.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFJL vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-3.81%	-0.81%	-6.79%	8.23%	-17.17%	-2.46%	-2.00%
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	27.17%	-6.77%	18.82%	13.27%	-22.60%	22.69%	28.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TFJL and BOUT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2020	0.04

Return for Risk

TFJL vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFJL

TFJL Risk / Return Rank: 6
TFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BOUT

BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 47
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFJL vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TFJL	BOUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	1.22	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.49	1.73	-2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.22	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	2.33	-2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.75	6.78	-7.54

TFJL vs. BOUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFJL Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the BOUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFJL and BOUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TFJL vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFJL drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFJL and BOUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFJL	BOUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.45%	-36.98%	+11.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-11.76%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.72%	-25.31%	+12.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.45%	-28.28%	+4.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.99%	-5.64%	-18.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.14%	-12.23%	-2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.24%	4.04%	+0.20%

Volatility

TFJL vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) is 2.95%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that TFJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFJL	BOUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	7.62%	-4.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.06%	17.74%	-11.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.37%	22.51%	-14.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.42%	19.82%	-10.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.03%	23.01%	-13.98%

TFJL vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFJL vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison

TFJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	0.27%	0.34%	0.60%	1.32%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFJL and BOUT in my portfolio?

TFJL and BOUT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFJL or BOUT?

BOUT has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to TFJL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFJL dropped -25.45% vs BOUT's -36.98%.

Which ETF is better, TFJL or BOUT?

On 5-year performance, BOUT leads with 7.49% vs -3.99% for TFJL. On fees, TFJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TFJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TFJL or BOUT?

Over the 5-year period, BOUT has performed better with a 7.49% return vs -3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFJL or BOUT?

TFJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFJL or BOUT?

BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for TFJL.

What is the main difference between TFJL and BOUT?

TFJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TFJL and 0.80% for BOUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.