TFI vs. CA
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA).
TFI and CA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TFI is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Municipal Managed Money (1-25 Y). It was launched on Sep 11, 2007. CA is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 13, 2023. Both TFI and CA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TFI vs. CA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TFI vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TFI SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF | -0.23% | 3.62% | -0.01% | 0.36% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | -0.08% | 3.05% | 1.51% | 0.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFI achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than CA's -0.08% return.
TFI
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 1.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
CA
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TFI vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFI has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TFI vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank
TFI
CA
TFI vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFI | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.62 | 3.35 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFI | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.57 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between TFI and CA is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TFI vs. CA - Dividend Comparison
TFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than CA's 3.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFI SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF | 3.15% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.41% | 1.87% | 1.71% | 1.91% | 2.14% | 2.26% | 2.16% | 2.39% | 2.40% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 2.93% | 3.14% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TFI vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFI drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, which is greater than CA's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFI and CA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFI | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.49% | -5.24% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.90% | -3.67% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -2.00% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -1.30% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 1.28% | -0.06% |
Volatility
TFI vs. CA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond ETF (TFI) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) at 1.31%. This indicates that TFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TFI | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 1.31% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | 1.78% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13% | 4.40% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 4.09% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.99% | 4.09% | +0.90% |