TFGPX vs. AHLPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TFGPX (American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund) and AHLPX (American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - TFGPX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by American Beacon, while AHLPX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by American Beacon. Over the past 5 years, TFGPX returned 2.59%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for AHLPX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. TFGPX charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for AHLPX.

Performance

TFGPX vs. AHLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund (TFGPX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFGPX achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than AHLPX's 11.59% return.

TFGPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 5.57%
• 3Y*: 8.44%
• 5Y*: 2.59%
• 10Y*: —

AHLPX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 11.59%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 3.65%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: 4.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFGPX vs. AHLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TFGPX American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund	1.37%	6.98%	8.63%	11.49%	-13.36%	2.03%	7.72%	11.63%	-1.26%	4.02%
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund	11.59%	2.19%	1.74%	-4.20%	16.48%	4.67%	10.36%	0.09%	2.15%	2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TFGPX and AHLPX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017	-0.04

The correlation between TFGPX and AHLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (5 years) to 0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TFGPX vs. AHLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFGPX

TFGPX Risk / Return Rank: 64
TFGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
TFGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TFGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TFGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TFGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

AHLPX

AHLPX Risk / Return Rank: 88
AHLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AHLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AHLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AHLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AHLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFGPX vs. AHLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund (TFGPX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TFGPX	AHLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.69	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	3.64	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.49	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	5.79	-3.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.52	18.28	-10.76

TFGPX vs. AHLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFGPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the AHLPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFGPX and AHLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TFGPX vs. AHLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFGPX drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, smaller than the maximum AHLPX drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFGPX and AHLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFGPX	AHLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.18%	-21.90%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-5.02%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.03%	-21.90%	+18.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.18%	-21.90%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.95%	+0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-6.75%	+3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	1.59%	-0.85%

Volatility

TFGPX vs. AHLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund (TFGPX) is 0.63%, while American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that TFGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFGPX	AHLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.63%	2.43%	-1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.94%	7.75%	-5.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33%	10.82%	-8.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.89%	9.63%	-5.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.85%	9.52%	-5.67%

TFGPX vs. AHLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFGPX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AHLPX's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFGPX vs. AHLPX - Dividend Comparison

TFGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than AHLPX's 7.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund	7.24%	8.07%	0.29%	0.63%	17.64%	7.15%	5.14%	4.17%	1.45%	4.07%	0.00%	3.40%
TFGPX American Beacon TwentyFour Strategic Income Fund	4.50%	4.50%	4.64%	5.30%	18.16%	3.36%	3.19%	3.69%	5.99%	2.26%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFGPX and AHLPX in my portfolio?

TFGPX and AHLPX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFGPX or AHLPX?

AHLPX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to TFGPX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFGPX dropped -20.18% vs AHLPX's -21.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AHLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.