TFFI vs. SCSB
TFFI (Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF) and SCSB (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. TFFI charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for SCSB.
Performance
TFFI vs. SCSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TFFI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCSB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFFI vs. SCSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF | 0.62% |
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFFI and SCSB is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFFI vs. SCSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFFI vs. SCSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFFI drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, which is greater than SCSB's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFFI and SCSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFFI | SCSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -0.46% | -3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -0.03% | -2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -0.09% | -1.56% |
Volatility
TFFI vs. SCSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFFI | SCSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.06% | 1.46% | +6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 1.46% | +6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 1.46% | +6.60% |
TFFI vs. SCSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFFI has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SCSB's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFFI vs. SCSB - Dividend Comparison
TFFI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.62% |
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFFI and SCSB have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.
SCSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for TFFI.
They also come from different issuers: Chesapeake and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TFFI and 0.33% for SCSB.
Find the right allocation for TFFI and SCSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer