PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFCGX vs. JATTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFCGX vs. JATTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFCGX achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly lower than JATTX's 16.78% return.


TFCGX

1D
-0.91%
1M
2.26%
6M
9.29%
YTD
14.88%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
-1.67%
10Y*

JATTX

1D
-0.86%
1M
3.48%
6M
12.32%
YTD
16.78%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFCGX vs. JATTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFCGX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund
14.88%9.60%20.36%20.16%-48.26%10.57%79.36%32.17%0.00%21.32%
JATTX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T
16.78%9.54%10.30%14.52%-23.75%6.63%28.41%28.30%-5.25%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TFCGX and JATTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.83

The correlation between TFCGX and JATTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFCGX vs. JATTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFCGX
TFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

JATTX
JATTX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JATTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JATTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JATTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JATTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JATTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFCGX vs. JATTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFCGXJATTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.14

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.97

8.74

-4.77

TFCGX vs. JATTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the JATTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFCGX and JATTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFCGX vs. JATTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFCGX drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than JATTX's maximum drawdown of -57.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFCGX and JATTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFCGXJATTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-57.77%

-39.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-11.09%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.73%

-23.90%

-73.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.73%

-31.90%

-65.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.93%

-0.86%

-95.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-8.73%

-23.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.40%

2.71%

+3.69%

Volatility

TFCGX vs. JATTX - Volatility Comparison

Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) at 5.47%. This indicates that TFCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JATTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFCGXJATTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

5.47%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.46%

13.35%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.09%

16.81%

+10.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,319.21%

19.74%

+1,299.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

956.06%

20.55%

+935.51%

TFCGX vs. JATTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFCGX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JATTX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFCGX vs. JATTX - Dividend Comparison

TFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JATTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JATTX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T
9.88%11.54%7.74%7.29%6.35%20.71%4.17%4.30%7.56%5.11%2.83%7.89%
TFCGX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.28%5.09%1.71%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFCGX and JATTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFCGX has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to JATTX (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFCGX dropped -97.73% vs JATTX's -57.77%.

JATTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFCGX and JATTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer