PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFCGX vs. DSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFCGX vs. DSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFCGX achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly lower than DSCIX's 26.61% return.


TFCGX

1D
3.24%
1M
5.53%
YTD
14.38%
6M
11.50%
1Y
33.37%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
-1.26%
10Y*

DSCIX

1D
1.36%
1M
6.37%
YTD
26.61%
6M
23.49%
1Y
50.04%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
10.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFCGX vs. DSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFCGX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund
14.38%9.60%20.36%20.16%-48.26%10.57%79.36%32.17%0.00%21.32%
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
26.61%13.18%5.10%20.00%-21.46%30.92%13.33%21.51%-16.96%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TFCGX and DSCIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.77

The correlation between TFCGX and DSCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFCGX vs. DSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFCGX
TFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DSCIX
DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFCGX vs. DSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFCGXDSCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.48

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

7.04

-5.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

25.36

-20.36

TFCGX vs. DSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the DSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFCGX and DSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFCGX vs. DSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFCGX drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than DSCIX's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFCGX and DSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFCGXDSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-47.60%

-50.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-7.08%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.73%

-32.94%

-64.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.73%

-32.94%

-64.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.95%

0.00%

-95.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-9.82%

-21.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

1.96%

+4.43%

Volatility

TFCGX vs. DSCIX - Volatility Comparison

Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) at 4.83%. This indicates that TFCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFCGXDSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

4.83%

+5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.76%

12.33%

+7.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.60%

17.36%

+9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,319.20%

22.21%

+1,296.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

958.86%

23.26%

+935.60%

TFCGX vs. DSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFCGX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DSCIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFCGX vs. DSCIX - Dividend Comparison

TFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
4.70%6.01%0.16%0.30%4.99%8.71%0.05%0.00%9.11%0.03%0.18%
TFCGX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.28%5.09%1.71%1.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFCGX and DSCIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFCGX has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to DSCIX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFCGX dropped -97.73% vs DSCIX's -47.60%.

DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFCGX and DSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer