PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFAQX vs. QDSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFAQX vs. QDSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFAQX achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly higher than QDSNX's 6.23% return.


TFAQX

1D
0.57%
1M
8.12%
YTD
9.74%
6M
8.89%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*

QDSNX

1D
1.02%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6.23%
6M
7.28%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFAQX vs. QDSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TFAQX
TFA Quantitative Fund
9.74%11.41%22.12%23.25%-25.11%10.88%10.35%
QDSNX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N
6.23%16.14%9.56%8.62%14.48%10.35%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TFAQX and QDSNX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.14

Over the past year, TFAQX and QDSNX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFAQX vs. QDSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFAQX
TFAQX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TFAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

QDSNX
QDSNX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
QDSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFAQX vs. QDSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFAQXQDSNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

3.12

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

4.69

-2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.61

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

7.87

-5.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.12

22.79

-14.67

TFAQX vs. QDSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFAQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the QDSNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFAQX and QDSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFAQXQDSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

3.12

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

1.44

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.63

-1.03

Drawdowns

TFAQX vs. QDSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFAQX drawdown since its inception was -27.78%, which is greater than QDSNX's maximum drawdown of -7.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAQX and QDSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFAQXQDSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.78%

-7.15%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-1.97%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.59%

-6.93%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-7.15%

-20.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-1.46%

-7.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

0.68%

+3.04%

Volatility

TFAQX vs. QDSNX - Volatility Comparison

TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) at 1.38%. This indicates that TFAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFAQXQDSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

1.38%

+2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

3.58%

+7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

5.00%

+9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

7.63%

+9.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

7.31%

+9.99%

TFAQX vs. QDSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFAQX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is lower than QDSNX's 3.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFAQX vs. QDSNX - Dividend Comparison

TFAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.26%, more than QDSNX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QDSNX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N
1.87%1.99%0.00%11.18%8.01%5.99%1.83%
TFAQX
TFA Quantitative Fund
9.26%10.16%0.00%0.03%5.06%20.52%4.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFAQX and QDSNX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFAQX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to QDSNX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFAQX dropped -27.78% vs QDSNX's -7.15%.

QDSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFAQX and QDSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer