TFAFX vs. GFSYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX).
TFAFX is managed by Tactical Fund Advisors. It was launched on Jun 9, 2019. GFSYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2017.
Performance
TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund | -6.64% | 11.54% | 20.19% | 19.64% | -24.11% | 16.14% | 7.88% | 3.73% |
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund | -0.78% | 5.49% | 7.60% | 5.98% | -0.57% | 4.96% | -0.17% | 1.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFAFX achieves a -6.64% return, which is significantly lower than GFSYX's -0.78% return.
TFAFX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GFSYX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFAFX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TFAFX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank
TFAFX
GFSYX
TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFAFX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.12 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.59 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 2.23 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 5.30 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFAFX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.12 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 1.21 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.88 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between TFAFX and GFSYX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison
TFAFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 3.71% | 12.30% | 4.64% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund | 7.23% | 7.18% | 8.54% | 13.00% | 4.20% | 1.59% | 1.53% | 2.24% | 2.17% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFAFX drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAFX and GFSYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFAFX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -9.54% | -16.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -1.39% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.67% | -4.49% | -21.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -0.78% | -8.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -0.92% | -6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 0.58% | +2.53% |
Volatility
TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison
Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.82%. This indicates that TFAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TFAFX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 0.82% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 1.78% | +8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 2.58% | +15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 3.64% | +11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 3.73% | +10.75% |