TFAFX vs. GFSYX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TFAFX (Tactical Growth Allocation Fund) and GFSYX (GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, TFAFX returned 7.59%/yr vs 4.77%/yr for GFSYX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TFAFX charges 1.96%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for GFSYX.

Performance

TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFAFX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's 0.45% return.

TFAFX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 7.80%
• 6M: 7.38%
• 1Y: 22.67%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: —

GFSYX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 3.13%
• 3Y*: 5.87%
• 5Y*: 4.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund	7.80%	11.54%	20.19%	19.64%	-24.11%	16.14%	7.88%	3.73%
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund	0.45%	5.49%	7.60%	5.98%	-0.57%	4.96%	-0.17%	1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between TFAFX and GFSYX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019	0.10

The correlation between TFAFX and GFSYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TFAFX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFAFX

TFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 43
TFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
TFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

GFSYX

GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 24
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TFAFX	GFSYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.29	+0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	1.88	+0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.24	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.42	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.15	5.13	+5.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFAFX and GFSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFAFX	GFSYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	1.29	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	1.31	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.90	-0.34

Drawdowns

TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFAFX drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAFX and GFSYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFAFX	GFSYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-9.54%	-16.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.30%	-1.39%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-4.49%	-13.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.67%	-4.49%	-21.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-0.91%	-6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	0.65%	+1.82%

Volatility

TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.83%. This indicates that TFAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFAFX	GFSYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	0.83%	+2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.06%	1.93%	+7.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	2.53%	+9.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.79%	3.66%	+11.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.41%	3.71%	+10.70%

TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFAFX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFAFX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

TFAFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund	7.14%	7.18%	8.54%	13.00%	4.20%	1.59%	1.53%	2.24%	2.17%	0.70%
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.20%	3.71%	12.30%	4.64%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFAFX and GFSYX in my portfolio?

TFAFX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFAFX or GFSYX?

TFAFX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to GFSYX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFAFX dropped -25.67% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TFAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.