TF.TO vs. MRU.TO
TF.TO (Timbercreek Financial Corp.) and MRU.TO (Metro Inc.) are both stocks. TF.TO operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services), while MRU.TO operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, TF.TO returned 1.70%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for MRU.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TF.TO achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than MRU.TO's -4.80% return.
TF.TO
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- -3.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- —
MRU.TO
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -5.02%
- 1Y
- -9.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TF.TO Timbercreek Financial Corp. | 0.53% | 6.58% | 16.09% | 3.20% | -19.62% | 19.59% | -5.44% | 22.00% | -1.96% | 18.70% |
MRU.TO Metro Inc. | -4.80% | 11.26% | 33.74% | -6.94% | 13.16% | 20.54% | 7.62% | 14.95% | 19.73% | 1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between TF.TO and MRU.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016 | 0.08 |
The correlation between TF.TO and MRU.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TF.TO:
CA$545.34M
MRU.TO:
CA$19.85B
TF.TO:
CA$0.36
MRU.TO:
CA$4.68
TF.TO:
18.15
MRU.TO:
19.92
TF.TO:
0.84
MRU.TO:
2.18
TF.TO:
3.74
MRU.TO:
0.90
TF.TO:
0.83
MRU.TO:
2.86
TF.TO:
CA$145.73M
MRU.TO:
CA$22.38B
TF.TO:
CA$79.48M
MRU.TO:
CA$4.16B
TF.TO:
CA$55.87M
MRU.TO:
CA$2.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TF.TO
MRU.TO
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO) and Metro Inc. (MRU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TF.TO | MRU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.92 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | -0.56 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | -0.97 | +0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TF.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.43%, smaller than the maximum MRU.TO drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TF.TO and MRU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TF.TO | MRU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -45.08% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.36% | -16.96% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.05% | -17.66% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.99% | -17.66% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -12.22% | +4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -6.71% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 9.87% | -2.84% |
Volatility
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO) is 3.57%, while Metro Inc. (MRU.TO) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that TF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TF.TO | MRU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 5.86% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 13.65% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 19.04% | -2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 16.64% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 17.25% | +1.80% |
Dividends
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Dividend Comparison
TF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.47%, more than MRU.TO's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRU.TO Metro Inc. | 1.67% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.76% | 1.47% | 1.49% | 1.58% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.39% | 1.20% |
TF.TO Timbercreek Financial Corp. | 10.47% | 10.09% | 9.76% | 10.35% | 9.76% | 7.18% | 7.99% | 6.95% | 7.89% | 7.12% | 3.92% | 0.00% |
Financials
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Timbercreek Financial Corp. and Metro Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Profitability Comparison
TF.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 22.05M and revenue of 39.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.
MRU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metro Inc. reported a gross profit of 882.80M and revenue of 5.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.
TF.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 17.68M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.
MRU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metro Inc. reported an operating income of 343.90M and revenue of 5.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
TF.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a net income of 10.37M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
MRU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metro Inc. reported a net income of 246.50M and revenue of 5.11B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TF.TO and MRU.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TF.TO and MRU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer