TEXN vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEXN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Texas Equity Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TEXN returned 30.05% vs 40.90% for IWM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEXN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

TEXN vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TEXN having a 20.05% return and IWM slightly higher at 20.47%.

TEXN

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -2.29%
• YTD: 20.05%
• 6M: 18.60%
• 1Y: 30.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: 17.64%
• 1Y: 40.90%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEXN vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	20.05%	8.33%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	20.47%	16.96%

Correlation

The correlation between TEXN and IWM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.66

TEXN vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEXN	IWM
Energy	32.3%	6.0%
Technology	20.6%	20.1%
Industrials	16.3%	17.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	8.0%
Real Estate	3.9%	5.5%
Financial Services	3.9%	15.5%
Communication Services	3.3%	1.7%
Utilities	2.7%	3.1%
Healthcare	2.7%	15.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	2.0%
Basic Materials	0.7%	4.5%

Return for Risk

TEXN vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEXN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 67
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEXN vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEXN	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.08	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.86	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.73	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.18	—

Drawdowns

TEXN vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEXN	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.34%	-59.05%	+52.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.34%	-11.03%	+4.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-0.96%	-3.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-10.75%	+9.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEXN	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.50%	19.74%	-5.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	22.61%	-8.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.50%	23.06%	-8.56%

TEXN vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEXN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TEXN vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than IWM's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.90%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	1.40%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEXN and IWM in my portfolio?

TEXN and IWM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEXN or IWM?

On 1-year performance, IWM leads with 40.90% vs 30.05% for TEXN. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEXN or IWM?

Over the 1-year period, IWM has performed better with a 40.90% return vs 30.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEXN or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TEXN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEXN or IWM?

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.90% for IWM.

What is the main difference between TEXN and IWM?

TEXN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TEXN and 0.19% for IWM.