TEXN vs. GBIL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEXN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Texas Equity Index, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TEXN returned 27.14% vs 3.82% for GBIL. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TEXN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.

Performance

TEXN vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEXN achieves a 20.04% return, which is significantly higher than GBIL's 1.79% return.

TEXN

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.85%
• 6M: 15.73%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 1Y: 27.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.71%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 4.57%
• 5Y*: 3.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEXN vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	20.04%	8.33%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	1.79%	2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TEXN and GBIL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

TEXN vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEXN

TEXN Risk / Return Rank: 78
TEXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TEXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TEXN Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TEXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TEXN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEXN vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEXN	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	16.75	-14.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	108.62	-105.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	47.94	-46.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	191.88	-187.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.70	1,688.12	-1,675.41

TEXN vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the GBIL Sharpe Ratio of 16.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEXN and GBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TEXN vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEXN	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.48%	-0.76%	-5.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.48%	-0.02%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	0.00%	-4.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-0.04%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	0.00%	+2.14%

Volatility

TEXN vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that TEXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEXN	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	0.06%	+3.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	0.14%	+10.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.54%	0.23%	+14.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.48%	0.58%	+13.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.48%	0.47%	+14.01%

TEXN vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEXN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TEXN vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than GBIL's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.71%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	1.40%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEXN and GBIL in my portfolio?

TEXN and GBIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEXN or GBIL?

TEXN has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to GBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEXN dropped -6.48% vs GBIL's -0.76%.

Which ETF is better, TEXN or GBIL?

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 27.14% vs 3.82% for GBIL. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEXN or GBIL?

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 27.14% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEXN or GBIL?

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TEXN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEXN or GBIL?

GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 1.40% for TEXN.

What is the main difference between TEXN and GBIL?

TEXN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GBIL is Government Bonds. TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TEXN and 0.12% for GBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.75 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.