PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEXN vs. ESN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEXN vs. ESN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEXN achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than ESN's 15.77% return.


TEXN

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.18%
6M
16.05%
YTD
20.86%
1Y
28.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESN

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.36%
6M
11.74%
YTD
15.77%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEXN vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
20.86%8.33%
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
15.77%9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TEXN and ESN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.56

The correlation between TEXN and ESN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEXN vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEXN
TEXN Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TEXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TEXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ESN
ESN Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEXN vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEXNESNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

3.61

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.15

14.18

-1.03

TEXN vs. ESN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ESN Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEXN and ESN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEXN vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum ESN drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and ESN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEXNESNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-13.60%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

-6.42%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.26%

-1.03%

-3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-1.83%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.64%

+0.52%

Volatility

TEXN vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) at 2.66%. This indicates that TEXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEXNESNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

2.66%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

7.47%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

9.92%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

13.13%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

13.13%

+1.34%

TEXN vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEXN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEXN vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison

TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than ESN's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
0.79%0.91%0.76%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
1.39%0.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEXN and ESN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEXN has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to ESN (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEXN dropped -6.48% vs ESN's -13.60%.

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 28.29% vs 23.08% for ESN. On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ESN has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 28.29% return vs 23.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.79% for ESN.

TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index, while ESN tracks Essential 40 Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KKM Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TEXN and 0.70% for ESN.

ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEXN and ESN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer