TEXN vs. BILS
TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) and BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEXN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Texas Equity Index, while BILS is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TEXN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILS.
Performance
TEXN vs. BILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEXN achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.57% return.
TEXN
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- —
TEXN vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 21.67% | 8.33% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.57% | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEXN and BILS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEXN vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank
TEXN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BILS
TEXN vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEXN | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 34.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 128.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1,292.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEXN vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and BILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEXN | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -0.41% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | 0.00% | -3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -0.04% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
TEXN vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEXN | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 0.23% | +14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 0.31% | +14.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 0.30% | +14.16% |
TEXN vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEXN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TEXN vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison
TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BILS's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 1.38% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEXN and BILS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BILS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BILS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TEXN.
BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 1.38% for TEXN.
TEXN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BILS is Ultrashort Bond. TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index, while BILS tracks Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TEXN and 0.14% for BILS.
Find the right allocation for TEXN and BILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer