PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEXN vs. BILS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEXN vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEXN achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.57% return.


TEXN

1D
0.91%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
21.67%
6M
20.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILS

1D
0.01%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.67%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEXN vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
21.67%8.33%
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
1.57%2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TEXN and BILS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEXN vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEXN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BILS
BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEXN vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEXNBILSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

34.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

128.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,292.26

TEXN vs. BILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEXN vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and BILS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEXNBILSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-0.41%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

0.00%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-0.04%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

TEXN vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEXNBILSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

0.23%

+14.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

0.31%

+14.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.46%

0.30%

+14.16%

TEXN vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEXN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TEXN vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BILS's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.08%5.01%4.98%1.61%
TEXN
iShares Texas Equity ETF
1.38%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEXN and BILS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BILS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TEXN.

BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 1.38% for TEXN.

TEXN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BILS is Ultrashort Bond. TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index, while BILS tracks Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TEXN and 0.14% for BILS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEXN and BILS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer