TEQI vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TEQI (T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TEQI returned 9.02%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for FUNL. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEQI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

TEQI vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEQI achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.

TEQI

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEQI vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF	9.71%	13.36%	13.14%	9.64%	-3.33%	26.25%	17.77%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	14.62%	15.55%	14.33%	-5.76%	25.93%	14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TEQI and FUNL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020	0.93

The correlation between TEQI and FUNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TEQI vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEQI	FUNL
Financial Services	20.3%	19.3%
Healthcare	12.9%	15.3%
Industrials	12.4%	11.5%
Technology	12.3%	14.6%
Energy	11.0%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	7.0%
Utilities	6.8%	5.0%
Communication Services	6.6%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	6.5%
Real Estate	3.3%	4.5%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.2%

Return for Risk

TEQI vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEQI

TEQI Risk / Return Rank: 57
TEQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TEQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TEQI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TEQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TEQI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 80
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEQI vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEQI	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.19	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	3.26	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.47	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	5.01	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.09	23.31	-13.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEQI vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEQI and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEQI	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.19	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.63	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.95	+0.03

Drawdowns

TEQI vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEQI drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQI and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEQI	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.82%	-19.35%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-3.83%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.85%	-17.37%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.82%	-19.35%	+1.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.12%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-3.54%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	0.82%	+1.20%

Volatility

TEQI vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that TEQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEQI	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	0.00%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	5.24%	+2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.52%	8.82%	+1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.61%	15.16%	-0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	15.29%	-0.17%

TEQI vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEQI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEQI vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

TEQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF	1.55%	1.71%	1.86%	2.12%	2.32%	3.03%	0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEQI and FUNL in my portfolio?

TEQI and FUNL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEQI or FUNL?

TEQI has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQI dropped -17.82% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, TEQI or FUNL?

On 5-year performance, FUNL leads with 9.42% vs 9.02% for TEQI. On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEQI or FUNL?

Over the 5-year period, FUNL has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEQI or FUNL?

FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TEQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEQI or FUNL?

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.55% for TEQI.

What is the main difference between TEQI and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TEQI and 0.50% for FUNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.