TEPIX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
TEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
TEPIX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEPIX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPIX ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund | -17.65% | 30.08% | 14.17% | 91.81% | -51.01% | 46.85% | 64.53% | 71.30% | -5.89% | 49.17% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.79% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEPIX achieves a -17.65% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, TEPIX has outperformed VONG with an annualized return of 22.57%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.65% annualized return.
TEPIX
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -12.17%
- YTD
- -17.65%
- 6M
- -15.84%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 22.57%
VONG
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEPIX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEPIX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
TEPIX
VONG
TEPIX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEPIX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 1.16 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | 4.00 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEPIX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.58 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.80 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.84 | -0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEPIX and VONG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TEPIX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
TEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than VONG's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPIX ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund | 3.91% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
TEPIX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEPIX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEPIX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.14% | -32.72% | -56.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.64% | -16.23% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.97% | -32.72% | -52.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.97% | -32.72% | -52.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.81% | -13.09% | -62.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -4.90% | -44.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 4.72% | +3.12% |
Volatility
TEPIX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Technology UltraSector Fund (TEPIX) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.72%. This indicates that TEPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEPIX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.12% | 6.72% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.02% | 12.34% | +11.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.33% | 22.40% | +17.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.04% | 21.35% | +123.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.40% | 20.82% | +84.58% |