TEMX vs. UEVM
TEMX (Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Touchstone, while UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. TEMX is actively managed, while UEVM is passively managed. Over the past year, TEMX returned 43.25% vs 24.92% for UEVM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEMX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
TEMX vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMX achieves a 27.65% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.
TEMX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 10.02%
- YTD
- 27.65%
- 6M
- 29.76%
- 1Y
- 43.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
TEMX vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF | 27.65% | 21.46% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 21.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMX and UEVM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between TEMX and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMX vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
TEMX
UEVM
TEMX vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEMX | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.56 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 8.65 | +2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEMX | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.65 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.83 | 0.33 | +1.50 |
Drawdowns
TEMX vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMX and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMX | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -45.44% | +30.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -9.79% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -2.18% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -11.67% | +9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 2.89% | +0.89% |
Volatility
TEMX vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.15%. This indicates that TEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMX | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 5.15% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.43% | 12.13% | +7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 15.18% | +6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 15.90% | +6.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 18.39% | +4.37% |
TEMX vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMX vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
TEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF | 0.85% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMX and UEVM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEMX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMX dropped -14.95% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 1-year performance, TEMX leads with 43.25% vs 24.92% for UEVM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TEMX has performed better with a 43.25% return vs 24.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TEMX.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.85% for TEMX.
TEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TEMX and 0.45% for UEVM.
TEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEMX and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer