TEMX vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TEMX (Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Touchstone, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TEMX returned 43.25% vs 1.88% for CAOS. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. TEMX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

TEMX vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEMX achieves a 27.65% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.

TEMX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 10.02%
• YTD: 27.65%
• 6M: 29.76%
• 1Y: 43.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMX vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	27.65%	21.46%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.82%	2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMX and CAOS is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	-0.35

Return for Risk

TEMX vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMX

TEMX Risk / Return Rank: 60
TEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 40
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMX vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEMX	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.24	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	1.98	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.26	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	2.49	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	6.22	+5.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEMX vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEMX and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEMX	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	1.24	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.83	1.21	+0.62

Drawdowns

TEMX vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMX and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMX	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-3.60%	-11.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.95%	-0.76%	-14.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-1.07%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-0.90%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	0.30%	+3.48%

Volatility

TEMX vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF (TEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that TEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEMX	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.77%	0.26%	+9.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.43%	1.03%	+18.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.87%	1.52%	+20.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.76%	4.26%	+18.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.76%	4.26%	+18.50%

TEMX vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMX vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

TEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TEMX Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets ex-China Growth ETF	0.85%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMX and CAOS in my portfolio?

TEMX and CAOS have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEMX or CAOS?

TEMX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMX dropped -14.95% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

Which ETF is better, TEMX or CAOS?

On 1-year performance, TEMX leads with 43.25% vs 1.88% for CAOS. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEMX or CAOS?

Over the 1-year period, TEMX has performed better with a 43.25% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMX or CAOS?

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMX or CAOS?

TEMX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between TEMX and CAOS?

TEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TEMX and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.